|
Happy New Year! Completing this newsletter is my last
productive act of 2003. I believe it is the most
important newsletter I've written yet, as I will be
revealing the secret to world peace. If you see its
value, please ask other media to reprint it... At least,
from the section, War and Peace.
Politics and Mental Health
I take my seminar evaluations very seriously, especially
the negative ones. Even though I dread reading them,
they are the ones that teach me the most.
One seminar participant wrote that she lost respect for
me because I spoke of politics - terrorism in particular.
I thought to myself, "Maybe I should take her advice.
Why risk alienating people by mentioning political
issues?"
Weeks later the answer hit me. If I took this advice I
would literally have to stop talking (which would make
my kids very happy). Virtually anything I say can be
offensive to someone because of their political views.
And every aspect of mental health is the result of
political activism by professional or lay groups at the
expense of others with conflicting agendas.
Pretending that psychology has nothing to do with
politics takes out neither the politics from psychology
nor the psychology from politics. But it does affect our
ability to make intelligent political decisions.
|
|
War and Peace |
 |
|
The same time that modern technology makes our lives
more comfortable, it also brings closer the possibility of
apocalyptic war. No wonder people never stop hoping
and praying for peace. The good news is that we
already possess the prescription for peace. It is right
under our noses.
The bad news is that we are in danger of losing the
solution to peace because most of us don't recognize
it. So the most important thing I can possibly do is
open people's eyes to the simple path to World Peace.
|
|
|
The Prescription for World Peace! |
 |
|
What is this wondrous solution? I'll give you a hint.
Have you ever noticed that modern democracies never
go to war with each other? Every war today involves at
least one dictatorship. Well, this is no coincidence.
Democratic countries don't go to war because of the
NATURE of democracy. This also means that warfare
would become a thing of the past if all the world's
nations were democratic. (My good friend Jamey
Breinberg has brought to my attention that what we
call "democracies" are really "republics." So I use the
word "democracy" colloquially, to denote countries
whose leaders are elected by the citizens in free,
multiparty elections.)
We take democracy for granted. We think it is the
normal way of government. But it isn't. We should be
extremely grateful to be living in a democracy.
Dictatorship has always been the normal form of
government. Many countries in the world are still
dictatorships, and no one is waiting in line to go live in
them.
Once every several thousand years, an invention comes
along that allows a quantum leap for humanity. One
such invention was agriculture. It freed us from the
shackles of foraging for food, and within ten thousand
years, the human population on earth jumped from
about 10 million to over 6 billion!
When the population density of a species increases,
violence increases. In order to prevent the rapidly
expanding human population from eradicating itself, our
ancestors developed CIVILIZATION, which is
highlighted by LIVING BY LAWS. This has worked
remarkably well, but has nevertheless left us with an
undesirable level of violence in the form of WAR
between nations.
The solution to this problem is DEMOCRACY. Democracy
is the single most significant social advance in the
history of civilization. Democracy enables phenomenal
prosperity while eliminating warfare between nations
that practice it.
Why don't democracies wage war with each other?
Read on.
To read previous newsletters... »
|
|
|
The Difference between Dictatorship and Democracy |
 |
|
The reason democracies don't go to war with one
another is due to the different psychological
ramifications of dictatorship and democracy.
The fundamental difference between dictatorship and
democracy is this: In dictatorships, people's actions
represent the will of the leader. In democracy, the
leaders' actions represent the will of the people. In
other words, in dictatorship, if we don't make our
LEADERS happy, they kill us. In a democracy, if our
leaders don't make US happy, we vote them out of
office.
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF DICTATORSHIP
When we live in dictatorship, it's child's play for our
leaders to fool us. They incessantly bombard us with
stories of their heroism and virtue. Since none of us
want to die, we don't dispute these stories.
Not wanting us to realize they are the true cause of
our miserable standard of living, our leaders have the
media inform us that our suffering is due to some evil
group or nation taking advantage of us. Our religious
leaders glorify our rulers and preach hatred against this
enemy group or nation because clergymen, too, want
to live.
Our leaders can declare war in a blink since it doesn't
matter what we think. They give us a choice between
immediate certain death at home or possible survival on
the battlefront, and we choose the battlefront.
Convinced that our "enemies" deserve to die, we
eagerly stage demonstrations against them. We never
hold demonstrations against our own leaders. Residents
of democracies see our unanimous support for our
leaders and often take it to be a sign of how correct
our cause must be. But there are two real reasons for
this monolithic support: 1) we don't want our leaders to
kill us, and 2) we live without freedom of speech, so we
have no way of knowing that our leaders are lying to
us. We can't even IMAGINE that there's anything about
our leadership to protest.
Sometimes our leaders hold "elections." We are asked
to choose between our leaders or death. Our leaders
win hands down.
THE PSYCHOLOGY OF DEMOCRACY
In a democracy, our leaders CAN fool us, but it's much
harder. They can't get away wit ripping out the
tongues of those who ridicule them, and they don't
have absolute control of the media or the government.
We can publicly call our leaders idiots and worse, and
they still have to make us like them or they'll be
browsing the Help Wanted. The opposing party is
constantly on the lookout for our leaders' blunders, and
busloads of reporters search endlessly for dirt on them.
This helps keep our leaders honest.
War is our leaders' last option because we won't vote
for them if they spill our children's blood for their
personal gain.
When our country has a problem with a fellow
democracy, the leaders of both sides will always find a
less violent solution than war. That's because the best
way to lose their power is by unnecessarily sending
citizens' children to die.
It is relatively easy for our leaders to convince us to go
to war against a dictatorship because their evil ways
provide plenty of justification. It would be practically
impossible for our leaders to convince us to go to war
against another democracy. So for other countries to
be safe from attack from the powerful democracies, it
is also in their best interest to be democracies.
|
|
|
Why Democracies are Stronger than Dictatorships |
 |
Open your eyes and you will notice that the
democracies of the world are far stronger than the
dictatorships. This is not accidental. And it is not
because we are more ruthless exploiters than dictators.
It is because our system of government is better.
Think of your body. It is comprised of approximately
one hundred trillions cells! For you to be a healthy
individual, your cells have to be healthy. Your body has
a system for monitoring the well-being of all your cells
and sends help where needed. Without this self-
monitoring system, we couldn't survive. Could you
imagine how long you would live if your body only
sent orders to the cells without concern for the
condition and needs of your cells?
A nation is no different. To be healthy, its individuals
have to be healthy. The better the communication
between the individuals and the nation, the healthier
the nation is.
A dictatorship is like your body with no concern for the
cells. Communication flows in one direction - from the
leader to the people, and they had better obey or they
die. The dictator is not overly concerned with the well-
being of his people because he will have absolute power
and incredible wealth regardless. But the nation will be
weak because the system doesn't provide the masses
with the means to be healthy and prosperous.
Democracy, in contrast, is like your body
communicating intimately with your cells. The voting
system enables people to give regular feedback to the
government on their condition. Since the leaders know
that it will be good for them, too, if their voters are
happy and healthy, they need to ensure that voters
get what they need. The democratic model of self-
regulation is much closer to that of a body in nature
and is therefore far more vibrant and effective than
dictatorship.
|
|
|
The Advantage of Dictatorship over Democracy |
 |
|
If democracies are stronger than dictatorships, how
can dictatorships challenge democracies? It is because
they have an advantage. If a dictator wants to declare
war, he has no resistance from his own people. They
stand up for him because they don't want him to kill
them and because they only know what he lets them
know.
But democracies have freedom of speech and their
citizens are permitted to develop and maintain contrary
opinions. Dictators can use this to neutralize the power
of the democracies. Since the dictatorships really ARE
weaker than their democratic foes, it is easy for them
to present themselves as innocent victims and gain the
sympathy of the democratic opponent's citizens. Since
those citizens want to avoid war, an internal struggle
arises between those who support the war and those
who oppose it. This can immobilize the government. To
make matters more difficult, other democracies may
take the side of the dictatorship because they, too,
have sympathy for the weaker side. These processes
weakens the democracy and embolden the
dictatorship.
|
|
|
The Danger of Taking Democracy for Granted |
 |
|
Who today recognizes what's special about democracy?
It's certainly not taught in our schools and universities.
Raised on the values of equality and diversity, we have
come to see each other as different but equal
individuals. Unfortunately, we then invite dictatorships
to join our celebration of diversity and mistakenly treat
them as a different but equal system of government to
democracy. As proof, the membership committee of the
UN does not discriminate between democracies and
dictatorships.
But dictatorship and democracy aren't "different but
equal." With all its faults, democracy is incomparably
better than dictatorship, both for the individual and the
nation as a whole.
Like a man selling a diamond for peanuts at a garage
sale because he thought it was cubic zirconium, we
may lose democracy because we fail to appreciate it's
incredible superiority to dictatorship. Millions of who
enjoy the benefits of life under democracy give their
support to cruel dictators because they see them
as the victims of their powerful democratic opponents.
Unfortunately, as weapons become more deadly, we
may one day all be wiped out because the democracies
of the world neutralized each other when faced with
some megalomaniac dictator.
Please take note! Nothing in this article is meant to
imply that everything a democratic country does is
good. Far from it. But a democracy has much greater
potential for doing good and being right than does a
dictatorship because it more closely represents the will
of the people.
|
|
|
How to Bring World Peace with One Billion Dollars |
 |
|
Can we bring about world peace without going to war?
I think it may be possible. The United States currently
invests billions of dollars weekly fighting for democracy.
I believe that if the nation truly wanted to bring
democracy to the world, it could accomplish far more
with one percent of the expenditure. The tool:
education. We haven't taken it seriously enough.
A dictator would never feel emboldened enough to
challenge a powerful democracy if he could not count
on the internal dissent within democracy. But
democracies will never completely unite as long as they
don't see the difference between themselves and
dictatorship. For the sake of the future of civilization,
the citizens of democracies need to be educated about
this difference. And if we are really to live by the
Golden Rule, we should all be fighting for the right of
the residents of dictatorships to enjoy the
freedoms we have under democracy.
With modern technology, a billion dollars can go a very
long way in spreading education about democracy.
Who in their right mind would conclude that dictatorship
is better than democracy once the diffences are
pointed out to them?In the first stage, efforts need be
directed only towards education within the democratic
countries. Once the democracies are united in their
appreciation of democracy, the dictatorships can then
be targeted. Most residents of dictatorships would
eagerly embrace democracy once the advantages are
clearly explained to them. Since most dictatorships are
ultimately dependent upon the economies of the world's
democracies for their wealth and power, it wouldn't be
hard for a unified democratic world to use economic
sanctions to force dictators to allow a peaceful
transition to democratic rule.
Do I believe this dream is possible? I may be crazy, but
I think it is the ONLY way to a world of peace. Do I
THINK it will come true? I doubt it. But I hope I am
wrong.
|
| Quick Links... |
 |
|